ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Review of CNN-Based Approaches for Preprocessing, Segmentation and Classification of Knee Osteoarthritis.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated knee MRI segmentation with KneeSeg-U for cartilage and bone extraction using an unsupervised deep learning framework.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in the biomechanics of knee osteoarthritis: biomechanical phenotyping, risk stratification, diagnosis, treatment and clinical translation-a narrative review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent joint disorder characterized by symptoms such as pain and stiffness, often leading to loss of function and disability. Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) represents the most prevalent type of osteoarthritis. KOA is usually detected using X-ray radiographs of the knee; however, the classification of disease severity remains subjective and varies among clinicians, motivating the need for automated assessment methods. In recent years, deep learning-based approaches have shown promising performance for KOA classification tasks, particularly when applied to structured imaging datasets. This review analyzes convolution neural network (CNN)-based approaches reported in the literature and compares their performance across multiple criteria. Studies were identified through systematic searches of IEEE Xplore, SpringerLink, Elsevier (ScienceDirect), Wiley Online Library, ACM Digital Library, and other sources such as PubMed and arXiv, with the last search conducted in March 2025. The review examines datasets used (primarily X-ray and MRI), preprocessing strategies, segmentation techniques, and deep learning architectures. Reported classification accuracies range from 61% to 98%, depending on the dataset, imaging modality, and task formulation. Finally, this paper highlights key methodological limitations in existing studies and outlines future research directions to improve the robustness and clinical applicability of deep learning-based KOA classification systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.