Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Haiyun ZhangInstitute of Eco-Environmental Protection, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China.
Cuixue CuiInstitute of Eco-Environmental Protection, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China.
Shuangxi LiInstitute of Eco-Environmental Protection, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China.
Weiguang LvInstitute of Eco-Environmental Protection, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China.
Juanqin ZhangInstitute of Eco-Environmental Protection, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China.
Xianpu ZhuInstitute of Eco-Environmental Protection, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China.
Chenglong XuInstitute of Eco-Environmental Protection, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China.
Qun WangKey Laboratory of Recycling and Eco-Treatment of Waste Biomass of Zhejiang Province, School of Environmental and Natural Resources, Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China.
Naling BaiInstitute of Eco-Environmental Protection, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6125-9337
Hanlin ZhangInstitute of Eco-Environmental Protection, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China.
Funding
Key Laboratory of Recycling and Eco-Treatment of Waste Biomass of Zhejiang Province 2024HZYB05National Key Research and Development Program of China 2024YFE0109703National Natural Science Foundation of China 42207436Shanghai Agriculture Applied Technology Development Program, China X2022-02-08-00-12-F01121The Outstanding Team Program of Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences Hu-Nong-Ke-Zhuo 2022 (008)
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of bio-organic fertilizer (BF) containing plant growth-promoting bacterium
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Bio-Organic Fertilizer with · full record | OpenQuestion