Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41681532›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Interspecific Larval Competition of Two

David S Wangila, Yucheng Wang, Adrian J Pekarcik, Fei Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David S WangilaDepartment of Entomology, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA.
Yucheng WangDepartment of Entomology, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA.
Adrian J PekarcikNorth Central Agricultural Research Laboratory, USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Brookings, SD 57006, USA.
Fei YangDepartment of Entomology, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5162-4575

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The western corn rootworm (WCR) and northern corn rootworm (NCR) are the two major belowground insect pests of corn in the U.S. Corn Belt. These species coexist in the same habitat, where their larvae feed on corn roots, increasing the risk of lodging and yield loss. Understanding larval competition between WCR and NCR is crucial for effective insect resistance management and integrated pest management. To assess interspecific larval competition between WCR and NCR, two independent greenhouse trials were conducted. We infested non-Bt corn plants with varying egg ratios of diapause and non-diapause populations of both species and counted the number of adults of each species recovered from each plant. Results showed that WCR consistently exhibited higher emergence rates than NCR, regardless of the initial egg infestation ratio. The observed ratio of NCR to WCR in both diapause and non-diapause groups was significantly lower than expected, suggesting that WCR is more competitive than NCR. The competitive dominance of WCR, coupled with climate warming, may facilitate its northward expansion across the U.S. This could potentially affect local NCR populations and further spread Bt and rotation resistance. Such changes could exacerbate pest management challenges in corn production systems. Integrating knowledge of corn rootworm competition, biology, resistance development, and climate change will be critical for developing informed management strategies to mitigate corn rootworm damage in agroecosystems effectively.

Indexed as

competitioncorn rootwormintegrated pest managementmaize

Identifiers

PMID41681532
PMCPMC12899028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.