Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41681483›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026

Antimicrobial Resistant Isolates in Surgical and Bite Wounds in Dogs and Cats: A 12-Year Retrospective Analysis.

Davide Danieli, Michela Amadori, Sara Crimi, Federica Pregnolato, Chiara Caruso, Graziana Gambino, Giovanni Re, Cristina Vercelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Davide DanieliDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy.ORCID 0009-0009-5572-3146
Michela AmadoriDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8302-6657
Sara CrimiDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy.ORCID 0009-0006-0698-3599
Federica PregnolatoCentro Veterinario Torinese (CVT) Hospital, 10098 Rivoli, Italy.
Chiara CarusoCentro Veterinario Torinese (CVT) Hospital, 10098 Rivoli, Italy.
Graziana GambinoDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0082-2541
Giovanni ReDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy.
Cristina VercelliDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7766-4647

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an increasingly concern in both human and veterinary medicine, complicating the management of common clinical infections. Surgical site infections (SSIs) and bite wounds in pets are especially challenging due to their polymicrobial nature and multidrug-resistant strains. Laboratory records from a referral veterinary hospital in northwestern Italy were retrospectively analyzed. Bacterial cultures and antimicrobial susceptibility testing results from canine and feline surgical and bite wounds collected between 2013 and 2024 were reviewed. Data were analyzed descriptively to identify bacterial distribution and resistance trends. A total of 35 isolates (23 dogs; 12 cats) were obtained from 26 surgical and 9 bite wounds. In dogs,

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistancebite woundscompanion animalssurgical site infections

Identifiers

PMID41681483
PMCPMC12896800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.