ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Comparative Effects of Silkworm Excrement Concentrate Extract Versus Sodium Copper Chlorophyllin on Growth, Metabolic Health and Immune Response in Common Carp (
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated the efficacy of two value-added products derived from silkworm excrement-a concentrated extract (SCE, 20:1) and sodium copper chlorophyllin (SCC)-as functional feed additives for common carp. Diets supplemented with 0.5% SCE, 1.0% SCE, or 0.1% SCC were compared to a basal control. The results revealed a distinct dose-dependent effect for SCE: 0.5% SCE was safe, while 1.0% SCE impaired growth, feed efficiency, and digestive enzyme activity. Both SCE and SCC significantly enhanced lipid metabolism, reducing hepatic lipid deposition and improving serum lipid profiles, albeit through distinct molecular pathways-SCC primarily stimulated catabolism, whereas SCE comprehensively regulated both synthesis and breakdown. Furthermore, SCE demonstrated superior, multi-targeted immunomodulatory capacity by favorably regulating inflammatory cytokine expression, an effect not observed with SCC. Although both additives boosted systemic antioxidant capacity, their specific patterns of enzyme activity and gene expression differed. In conclusion, SCE offers broad-spectrum, synergistic benefits for health modulation, while SCC provides specific, stable bioactivity, highlighting the importance of selecting the appropriate additive form based on desired functional outcomes in aquaculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.