Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41681398›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026

It's Premature to Encourage Working Cats for Rodent Control on Australian Dairy Farms.

Michael C Calver, Heather M Crawford, Tim Kurz, Jo Watson, Bruce L Webber

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael C CalverEnvironmental and Conservation Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia.
Heather M CrawfordEnvironmental and Conservation Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5223-6619
Tim KurzSchool of Psychological Science, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2037-0995
Jo WatsonSchool of Psychological Science, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9441-7370
Bruce L WebberSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5934-6557

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rodents are significant agricultural pests in Australia and internationally. Recent proposals to address the Australian problems by allowing farmers to obtain desexed cats, at tax-deductible cost, to control rodents on their properties are, superficially, attractive, especially given enthusiastic endorsement from 15 dairy farmers from nine properties in Queensland and New South Wales. We argue that far stronger evidence is required to take this solution seriously, and for broader ethical and regulatory reasons, it may not be appropriate even if evidence was forthcoming. Evidence via direct population monitoring or indirect monitoring using bait removal is first needed to show that rodents are effectively suppressed by cats and how many cats are required. Further supportive evidence could come from monitoring the diets of cats using techniques such as analysis of stomach contents or scats, collar-mounted video cameras, or stable isotope analysis of cat tissues such as whiskers. These techniques would also quantify any predation by farm cats on wildlife. Population monitoring of cats would confirm whether there is unwanted immigration of cats into the farm cat population, while economic modeling could compare the costs of a farm cat program to other rodent control options. In the absence of such data, promotion of cats as a solution to rodent issues on Australian farms remains unsubstantiated and is premature.

Indexed as

animal welfareevidence-based decisionsfarm catshuman health impactsintegrated pest managementone welfareroaming catsrodent controlstray catswildlife predation

Identifiers

PMID41681398
PMCPMC12897469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.