ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Development of Cells Repository of
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Thailand harbors a remarkable diversity of betta (Siamese fighting fish); however, their wild populations are threatened by habitat loss and genetic pollution from released ornamental fish. Therefore, effective conservation strategies are needed to extend traditional in situ and ex situ methods, which are resource-intensive and prone to external threats. This study established a practical approach for cultivating cells from ornamental bettas and applying it to 11 wild species collected from their specific type localities in Thailand. Additionally, relevant available data on water properties were collected. Cell isolation was achieved from larval caudal fin bud and adult caudal fin tissues, with larval specimens exhibiting a significantly higher isolation success rate (83.3%) and a shorter initial cultivation period (13.27 ± 3.2 days) compared to adult cells (38.8% success, 24.33 ± 7.8 days initial period). After overcoming senescence, the cell doubling time (DT) was approximately 2 days, and cryopreservation assays demonstrated post-thaw viability over 80%, ensuring the long-term viability. While larval isolation is challenging, adult fin biopsy provides a superior alternative by bypassing breeding and euthanasia. This non-lethal, repeatable sampling method allows for precise species identification via external morphology, offering a highly efficient strategy for conservation. Cell isolation was achieved for 10 of the 11 species, 9 of which resulted in established, cryopreserved cell lines, representing the first maintained cell lines from larval and adult tissues of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.