Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41681389›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026

Development of Cells Repository of

Sukumal Prukudom, Yanika Piyasanti, Santi Poungcharean, Suparat Chaipipat, Kornkanok Sritabtim, Juthathip Jurutha, Chonphoom Phan-Poe, Rungthiwa Sinsiri, Soranuth Sirisuay, Kannika Siripattarapravat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sukumal PrukudomKasetsart University Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory-Bangkhen, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-2001-136X
Yanika PiyasantiKasetsart University Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory-Bangkhen, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
Santi PoungchareanDepartment of Fishery Biology, Faculty of Fisheries, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-8521-4897
Suparat ChaipipatKasetsart University Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory-Bangkhen, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.ORCID 0009-0000-0945-7144
Kornkanok SritabtimKasetsart University Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory-Bangkhen, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
Juthathip JuruthaKasetsart University Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory-Bangkhen, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.ORCID 0009-0001-8854-8163
Chonphoom Phan-PoeKasetsart University Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory-Bangkhen, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
Rungthiwa SinsiriKasetsart University Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory-Bangkhen, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
Soranuth SirisuayDepartment of Aquaculture, Faculty of Fisheries, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-6641-8384
Kannika SiripattarapravatKasetsart University Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory-Bangkhen, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-5847-2356

Funding

National Research Council of Thailand 38433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thailand harbors a remarkable diversity of betta (Siamese fighting fish); however, their wild populations are threatened by habitat loss and genetic pollution from released ornamental fish. Therefore, effective conservation strategies are needed to extend traditional in situ and ex situ methods, which are resource-intensive and prone to external threats. This study established a practical approach for cultivating cells from ornamental bettas and applying it to 11 wild species collected from their specific type localities in Thailand. Additionally, relevant available data on water properties were collected. Cell isolation was achieved from larval caudal fin bud and adult caudal fin tissues, with larval specimens exhibiting a significantly higher isolation success rate (83.3%) and a shorter initial cultivation period (13.27 ± 3.2 days) compared to adult cells (38.8% success, 24.33 ± 7.8 days initial period). After overcoming senescence, the cell doubling time (DT) was approximately 2 days, and cryopreservation assays demonstrated post-thaw viability over 80%, ensuring the long-term viability. While larval isolation is challenging, adult fin biopsy provides a superior alternative by bypassing breeding and euthanasia. This non-lethal, repeatable sampling method allows for precise species identification via external morphology, offering a highly efficient strategy for conservation. Cell isolation was achieved for 10 of the 11 species, 9 of which resulted in established, cryopreserved cell lines, representing the first maintained cell lines from larval and adult tissues of

Indexed as

cell culturecryopreservationtype localitywild betta

Identifiers

PMID41681389
PMCPMC12896975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.