ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Serial Correlations of Partial Body Weight and Feed Intake in Crossbred Cattle.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Feeding behavior in cattle affects feed efficiency, which is important for increasing the profitability of production while simultaneously reducing the environmental impact. Over a six-year period, indigenous beef cows (Afrikaner, Bonsmara, Nguni) were crossed with indigenous and exotic (Angus, Simmental) sires in a hot and arid area, to produce 15 breed groups. After weaning, the bull calves were fed in a feedlot setting wherein daily feed intake and partial body weight were measured. The serial correlations of daily feed intake and partial body weight on consecutive days were estimated for each animal. Analyses of variance for the z-transformed serial correlations of daily feed intake and partial body weight were conducted. The linear model included the fixed effect of test group comprising pen and date at the beginning of the test and a fixed breed group effect. The average serial correlation of daily feed intake (r = 0.10) was interpreted to suggest that a test period of 36 days was sufficient to achieve 80% average accuracy for the animals being tested. The average serial correlation of partial body weight was very high (r = 0.94). Thus, there seems little need to average values over days to achieve an accurate estimate of the weight of an animal at any specific point in time. Variation among animals in the serial correlation of daily feed intake indicates differences in feeding behavior over time, but this variability was not related to breed composition. The results indicate that a test period of 36 days is sufficient to achieve 80% accuracy of the mean for daily feed intake of the animals being tested.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.