ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Effects of Soft Ground on Paw Center of Pressure Metrics in Dogs During Walk and Trot.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physiotherapeutic interventions in dogs frequently incorporate compliant surfaces to improve postural stability (PS), proprioception, and limb coordination; however, objective assessment of surface-related locomotor adaptations remains limited. This study investigated the effects of walking on surfaces with increasing compliance on PS in healthy adult dogs using paw center of pressure (pCOP) analysis. Fourteen orthopedically and neurologically sound dogs were assessed at walk and trot on a pressure-sensitive walkway under four surface conditions: a standard rubber mat (0.1 cm) and three yoga mats of increasing thickness (0.5 cm, 0.8 cm, and 1.0 cm). Vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) and pCOP parameters were recorded and analyzed for each limb. vGRF parameters were largely unaffected by surface conditions. In contrast, several pCOP metrics, including pCOP radius, craniocaudal displacement, and mediolateral displacement, showed a significant decrease with increasing surface compliance. These effects were more consistent and widespread during trot, whereas during walk changes were primarily observed in the forelimbs. The findings indicate that dogs adapt to increased surface compliance by reducing pCOP displacement, likely reflecting active postural stabilization strategies. While vGRF parameters appeared insensitive to these adaptations, pCOP measures proved more sensitive in detecting subtle neuromuscular adjustments. These results highlight the potential value of pCOP analysis for evaluating functional adaptations during physiotherapeutic interventions in canine rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.