Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41681375›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026

Pathological Manifestations Rendering Pigs and Cattle Unfit for Transportation in Denmark.

Amanda Øpstun Birk, Henrik Elvang Jensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amanda Øpstun BirkFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Ridebanevej 3, 1870 Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Henrik Elvang JensenFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Ridebanevej 3, 1870 Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7277-7829

Funding

European Partnership of Animal Health and Welfare 0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

EU regulations concerning the evaluation of animals' fitness for transportation are in several ways rather vague, which leaves room for individual interpretation of the legislation with a potential negative impact on animal welfare. In order to guide interpretation of the unclear statements within the legislation, all forensic case files handled during a 10-year period (2014-2023) on Danish pigs and cattle that had been declared unfit for transportation and subsequently reported to the police, were evaluated. A total of 327 case files addressing 428 animals were examined. Most pigs were declared unfit for transportation due to the presence of severe open wounds, whereas lameness was the main reason for cattle being deemed unfit. In conclusion, most wounds rendering both pigs and cattle unfit for transportation measured at least 3 cm in diameter, apart from those located in sensitive areas, e.g., tails. Manifestations rendering pigs unfit for transportation due to lameness were primarily joint lesions, whereas fractures were the dominant cause of lameness in cattle. Therefore, the focus should be on these manifestations when assessing animals for transport fitness.

Indexed as

animal welfarecattleforensicpigstransport fitness

Identifiers

PMID41681375
PMCPMC12896670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.