Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41681361›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026

Delineating Bird Ecological Networks in Coastal Areas Based on Seasonal Variations and Ecological Guilds Differences.

Songyao Huai, Qianshuo Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Songyao HuaiCollege of Architecture and Urban Planning, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266033, China.ORCID 0009-0004-7629-2924
Qianshuo ZhaoCollege of Marine Life Science, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6352-4176

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 52278019National Natural Science Foundation of China 52408073Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation ZR2020ME212Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation ZR2024QE399Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation ZR2025MS351
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Habitat fragmentation and human disturbance pose major challenges to bird movement and ecological connectivity, highlighting the need for effective ecological network construction in conservation planning. Although coastal ecological networks have received increasing attention, few studies have simultaneously examined seasonally explicit patterns, functional guild differences, and seasonally varying recreational disturbance. Using a coastal case study, we analyzed seasonal (spring, summer, autumn, winter) and guild-specific (wading birds, songbirds, raptors, and swimming birds) variations in bird ecological networks by integrating systematic field surveys (2023-2024) with citizen science records (2020-2025). Results indicated clear differences among guilds and seasons: swimming birds exhibited relatively complex and well-connected networks, whereas wading birds showed lower connectivity. Conservation priority areas varied markedly across seasons, being more extensive in spring (28.62%), autumn (23.69%), and winter (22.09%), but substantially reduced in summer (17.07%). Our findings provide a locally grounded reference for adaptive conservation planning in rapidly changing coastal landscapes, with particular attention to the protection and connectivity of coastal and estuarine wetlands for wading birds.

Indexed as

bird ecological networkfunctional guild differenceshuman recreation disturbanceseasonally explicit ecological networks

Identifiers

PMID41681361
PMCPMC12896933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.