Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41681356›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026

Animals as Communication Partners: Ethics and Challenges in Interspecies Language Research.

Hanna Mamzer, Maria Kuchtar, Waldemar Grzegorzewski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hanna MamzerFaculty of Sociology, Adam Mickiewicz University, 61-614 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2251-7639
Maria KuchtarFaculty of Biology, Nature Conservation and Sustainable Development, University of Rzeszów, 35-310 Rzeszów, Poland.ORCID 0009-0003-3605-5724
Waldemar GrzegorzewskiFaculty of Biology, Nature Conservation and Sustainable Development, University of Rzeszów, 35-310 Rzeszów, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3522-1327

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interspecies communication is increasingly recognized as an affective-cognitive process co-created between humans and animals rather than a one-directional transmission of signals. This review integrates findings from ethology, neuroscience, welfare science, behavioral studies, and posthumanist ethics to examine how emotional expression, communicative intentionality, and relational engagement shape understanding across species. Research on primates, dogs, elephants, and marine mammals demonstrates that empathy, consolation, cooperative signaling, and multimodal perception rely on evolutionarily conserved mechanisms, including mirror systems, affective contagion, and oxytocin-mediated bonding. These biological insights intersect with ethical considerations concerning animal agency, methodological responsibility, and the interpretation of non-human communication. Emerging technological tools-bioacoustics, machine vision, and AI-assisted modeling-offer new opportunities to analyze complex vocal and behavioral patterns, yet they require careful contextualization to avoid anthropocentric misclassification. Synthesizing these perspectives, the review proposes a relational framework in which meaning arises through shared emotional engagement, embodied interaction, and ethically grounded interpretation. This approach highlights the importance of welfare-oriented, minimally invasive methodologies and supports a broader shift toward recognizing animals as communicative partners whose emotional lives contribute to scientific knowledge. This review primarily synthesizes empirical and theoretical research on primates and dogs, complemented by selected examples from elephants and marine mammals, which provide the most developed evidence base for the affective-cognitive and relational mechanisms discussed.

Indexed as

animal cognitionanimal welfareartificial intelligencedogsempathyinterspecies communicationprimatesresearch ethics

Identifiers

PMID41681356
PMCPMC12896553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.