ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Comparison of Delta Total Nucleated Cells Assessed via Sysmex XT-2000iV and Sysmex XN-1000V in Effusions in Cats.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ratio of the nucleated cell counts (ΔTNC) provided by the Sysmex XT-2000iV DIFF and BASO channels has been proven to be useful in differentiating effusions in cats; in particular, a ΔTNC > 2.5 was found to have high accuracy for effusive FIP. The objective of this study was to compare the ΔTNC obtained with the Sysmex XT-2000iV and Sysmex XN-1000V on different types of effusions. Fresh effusions from cats were evaluated with both analyzers. WBC-BASO, WBC-DIFF, and ΔTNC-XT from the Sysmex XT-2000iV and TNC-WNR, TNC-WDF, and ΔTNC-XN from the Sysmex XN-1000V were recorded and compared. Forty-five feline effusions were collected. The results were not significantly different for all parameters evaluated. The Passing and Bablok regression analysis for ΔTNC-XT and ΔTNC-XN revealed a slope of 1.612 (95% CI 1.030 to 2.316) and an intercept of -0.744 (95% CI -1.591 to -0.120); the Bland-Altman difference plot showed a positive bias of 4.382 (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.