ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Optimized Animal Models for the Genetic Evaluation of Conformation Traits, Milking Ease, and Milking Temperament in Dairy Gir Cattle.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate four different models for the genetic evaluation of sixteen conformation traits, milking ease, and milking temperament in Dairy Gir cattle. The models vary based on whether they include only statistically significant fixed effects or all recorded effects, along with contemporary groups (CGs) treated as fixed or random effects. Categorical traits were also analyzed using a threshold model. The adjusted R-squared (Radj2) was used to compare the goodness-of-fit of the linear models. Spearman's rank correlation and the average accuracy of bull estimated breeding values (EBVs) with at least 20 phenotyped daughters were compared. Models fitting CG as a random effect performed better based on their Radj2 values and had a greater average accuracy of EBVs for most traits. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients indicated low to medium bull EBV re-ranking between most of the models. The linear models performed better than threshold models for almost all traits. When possible, more parsimonious linear models fitting only significant fixed effects should be used to reduce the standard error of estimation. Additionally, fitting CGs as a random effect seems more beneficial for the genetic evaluation of conformation and milking traits in Dairy Gir cattle in Brazil.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.