Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41681338›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026

Leveraging Fst and Genetic Distance to Optimize Reference Sets for Enhanced Cross-Population Genomic Prediction.

Le Zhou, Lin Zhu, Fengying Ma, Mingjuan Gu, Risu Na, Wenguang Zhang

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Le ZhouCollege of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010010, China
Lin ZhuCollege of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010010, China
Fengying MaCollege of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010010, China
Mingjuan GuCollege of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010010, ChinaORCID 0000-0002-8244-9519
Risu NaCollege of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010010, China
Wenguang ZhangCollege of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010010, China

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic selection often faces challenges of insufficient prediction accuracy in cross-population applications, primarily due to differences in linkage disequilibrium patterns between populations. This study proposes an Fst-based strategy to enhance prediction performance by constructing a cross-population reference set with high genetic similarity to the target population (PopA). By integrating Fst-mediated SNP screening and Euclidean genetic distance analysis, the top 10%, 15% and 20% of individuals genetically most similar to PopA were screened from PopB and PopC, respectively, leading to the generation of six reference sets characterized by different mixing proportions. The results demonstrate that incorporating the top 10-20% of the most similar individuals significantly improves the accuracy and robustness of genomic estimated breeding value predictions. Among the methods evaluated, ssGBLUP and wGBLUP performed best, with prediction accuracy increasing as the mixing proportion rose up to 20%. This approach effectively mitigates structural bias caused by inter-population genetic differences and significantly enhances prediction efficiency. The multi-level mixing experiment not only validates the practical value of Fst and Euclidean distance but also provides theoretical support and a feasible solution for the efficient integration of cross-population germplasm resources.

Indexed as

admixture proportioncross-population predictionfixation index (Fst)genetic distancegenomic selection

Identifiers

PMID41681338
PMCPMC12896712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.