ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Evaluating Adjusted ssGBLUP Models for Genomic Prediction and Matrix Compatibility in South African Holstein Cattle.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Accuracy of genomic prediction for milk production traits in Mehsana buffalo.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In populations with limited genotyping, single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictions (ssGBLUP) can produce biased or less accurate genomic predictions due to incompatibilities between genomic and pedigree relationship matrices. The study evaluated the impact of five alternative ssGBLUP models for genomic predictions of milk, fat, and protein yield production traits in South African Holstein cattle. The dataset included 696,413 milk production records and pedigrees of 541,325 animals. Production traits were 305-day lactation yields for milk, protein, and fat. Genotype data were based on the Illumina 50K chip v3, with 53,218 SNPs. A total of 1221 animals with genotypes and 41,407 SNP markers were in the final dataset. The five models used to estimate genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) were the single-step method (ssGBLUP), ssGBLUP accounting for inbreeding (ssGBLUP_Fx), ssGBLUP with unknown parent groups (ssGBLUP_upg), and two ssGBLUP models with blending, tuning, and scaling parameters set to optimum values in constructing the inverse of the unified relationship matrix (ssGBLUP_adjusted). Realized prediction accuracies were highest for ssGBLUP_adjusted models (6-7% improvements compared to ssGBLUP). Accuracy of GEBVs for milk, protein, and fat yields ranged from 0.23, 0.29, and 0.30 for both ssGBLUP and ssGBLUP_Fx, 0.26, 0.32, and 0.34 for ssGBLUP_upg, and 0.29, 0.35, and 0.37 for ssGBLUP_adjusted models, respectively. Corresponding bias, expressed as regression coefficients, ranged from 0.30, 0.31, and 0.36 for ssGBLUP; 0.31, 0.32, and 0.37 for ssGBLUP_Fx; 0.41, 0.44, and 0.49 for ssGBLUP_upg; and 0.44, 0.47, and 0.53 for ssGBLUP_adjusted models, respectively. The improved accuracy and reduced bias observed with the ssGBLUP_adjusted underscores the importance of optimizing the blending of pedigree- and genome-based relationships to achieve more reliable GEBVs, thereby improving selection decisions in Holstein dairy cattle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.