ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Controllable Preparation and Filtration Performance of New Composite Materials for Mining Masks.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The effective isolation of high-concentration dust during mining and transportation processes is a hot issue of occupational health concern for workers. Based on the characteristics of graphene and its derivatives, a new type of mining mask made of graphene oxide polypropylene composite material (GO polypropylene composite material) and reduced graphene oxide polypropylene composite material (rGO polypropylene composite material) was prepared using the direct impregnation method. Moreover, particle filtration performance tests were conducted under different gas flow conditions. The results showed that, at the same concentration, the reduction group (rGO polypropylene composite material) had more compliance indicators, and the comprehensive performance ranking was as follows: reduction group (rGO polypropylene composite material) > oxidation group (GO polypropylene composite material) > control group (polypropylene composite material). The reduction group with a concentration of 0.3 g/L showed the best overall performance. At a flow rate of 1.0 m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.