ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Influence of Cutting-Edge Micro-Geometry on Material Separation and Minimum Cutting Thickness in the Turning of 304 Stainless Steel.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The micro-geometry of the cutting edge plays a crucial role in material flow ahead of the cutting edge and chip formation, primarily influencing chip formation mechanisms and the minimum cutting thickness. In the context of turning 304 stainless steel, however, existing research still lacks a unified quantitative framework linking "cutting edge micro-geometry-material separation behavior (separation point/minimum uncut chip thickness)-microstructural evolution of the machined surface." This gap hampers mechanistic optimization design aimed at enhancing machining quality. This study examines the turning of 304 stainless steel by integrating analytical modeling, finite element simulation, and experimental validation to develop a predictive model for minimum cutting thickness. It analyzes the effects of tool nose radius and asymmetric edge morphology, and a microstructure evolution prediction subroutine is developed based on dislocation density theory. The results indicate that the minimum cutting thickness exhibits a positive correlation with the tool nose radius, and their ratio remains stable within the range of 0.25 to 0.30. Under asymmetric edge conditions, the minimum cutting thickness initially increases and then decreases as the K-factor varies. The developed subroutine, based on the dislocation density model, enables accurate prediction of dislocation density, grain size, and microhardness in the machined surface layer. Among the factors considered, the tool nose radius demonstrates the most pronounced influence on microstructure evolution. This research provides theoretical support and a technical reference for optimizing cutting-edge design and enhancing the machining quality of 304 stainless steel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.