ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Influence of Rolling Direction on Barkhausen Noise in Low-Alloyed Steel MC500.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study examines the impact of rolling direction on Barkhausen noise emission from the low-alloyed steel MC 500 during a uniaxial tensile test. The samples of gauged shape were cut along both the rolling and transverse directions to investigate the process of magnetic anisotropy alterations, as expressed in terms of Barkhausen noise and the extracted features. Barkhausen noise was studied as a function of both elastic and plastic straining (up to plastic strain 21.5%), and the role of domain wall realignment with respect to the rolling direction, as well as the direction of the tensile load, was analysed. Barkhausen noise emission is linked to both the stress state and the microstructure, and the role of external stressing is contrasted with the residual stress state. Barkhausen noise is measured directly during a tensile test (in situ) as well as after unloading (ex situ). It was found that Barkhausen noise is significantly affected by stress directly during the tensile test (in situ), whereas the contribution of residual stresses is less pronounced. Barkhausen noise measured in situ during the tensile test in the direction of the tensile load is higher (about 1100 mV) compared to the transverse direction (about 500 mV). However, this relationship is reversed for the ex situ measurements, especially for the more developed plastic strains above 15%. The influence of rolling direction on Barkhausen noise is relatively minor, and Barkhausen noise after matrix yielding is primarily affected by increasing dislocation density growing from 3 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.