ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Data-Driven Optimization and Modelling of the Gap Bridgeability Performance of Multi-Pin Friction Stir Welded EN AW 7020-T651 Joints.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Friction stir welding (FSW) of high-strength aluminum alloys, including EN AW 7020-T651, encounters significant challenges under weld line gap conditions, leading to compromised joint integrity. This study develops a predictive, data-driven framework to assess and optimize the gap bridgeability performance of FSW joints with weld line gaps ranging from 0 to 4 mm in 2 mm thick plates. A structured experimental matrix was implemented, systematically varying rotational speed, welding speed, axial force, and tool shoulder diameter. To promote stable material flow and consistent weld quality under varying gap conditions, a multi-pin tool was employed throughout the welding trials. This configuration supported defect-free weld formation across a broad process window and contributed to improved weld soundness under gap conditions. Weld quality was evaluated using a comprehensive, multi-criteria approach that required (i) defect-free joints verified by visual and cross-sectional (metallographic) inspection, (ii) an ultimate tensile strength of at least 230 MPa, and (iii) a novel metric termed weak area percentage (WAP). Derived from micro-hardness mapping, WAP quantified the proportion of the heat-affected zone (HAZ) exhibiting hardness below 96 HV, providing a more robust and spatially sensitive measure of mechanical integrity than conventional average hardness values. Two machine learning models, Logistic Regression and Random Forest, were trained to classify weld acceptability. The Random Forest model demonstrated superior performance, achieving 92.5% classification accuracy and an F1-score of 0.90. Feature importance analysis identified the interaction terms "welding speed × gap size" and "rotational speed × gap size" as the most influential predictors of weld quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.