ArticleHuman brain mapping2026
Parsing Reward Processing Substages With Multimodal EEG-fMRI.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Reward Positivity Tracks Positive Reward Prediction Errors From Feedback to Cues During Reinforcement Learning.Psychophysiology · 2026Article
- Parsing Reward Processing Substages With Multimodal EEG-fMRI.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multimodal imaging studies that combine temporally and spatially precise methods can enhance understanding of reward neurocircuitry by revealing how signals specifically time-locked to reward processing substages relate to functional network-level activity. Prior reward studies that require decision making and/or motor responses to obtain rewards may complicate efforts to isolate basic reward responses from higher-order functions that support reward attainment. Here, we take an integrated, multimodal approach to evaluate anticipatory and consummatory reward processing substages, while minimizing demands on higher-order cognitive and motor processes. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electrophysiological (EEG) data were separately recorded from 52 adults playing a simple, slot machine task, with reward outcomes independent of performance. Joint Independent Component Analyses (jICAs) were conducted with EEG-based event-related potential (ERP) difference waveforms and fMRI contrast images specific to reward anticipation and outcome processing substages. Resulting joint independent components (JICs) segregated reward processing substages, indicating significant co-modulation between temporal ERP and spatial fMRI signals (p < 0.001). During Reward Anticipation, a JIC with the temporal signature of the stimulus preceding negativity (SPN) ERP component covaried with fMRI activation in bilateral supplementary motor areas (pre-SMA/SMA) and inferior fronto-insular salience network regions implicated in attentional orienting and shifting. During Reward Feedback, JICs with the temporal signature of the reward positivity (RewP) ERP component covaried with fMRI activation in dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), ventral striatum, SMA, and inferior frontal cortex, extending to the insula. Further, trait reward sensitivity correlated with jICA-informed Win > Loss brain activations during Reward Feedback (p = 0.016). Our findings demonstrate that temporally precise electrophysiological and spatially rich hemodynamic measures of reward processing converge to map onto specific substages of reward-related brain processes. ERP and fMRI signaling during reward feedback support covariation of the RewP with dACC-striatal reward networks while the SPN covaried with fMRI signal in pre-SMA/SMA and inferior fronto-insular regions implicated in motor planning, salience, and attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.