Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41681123›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2026

Parsing Reward Processing Substages With Multimodal EEG-fMRI.

Ken J Lau, Brian J Roach, Samantha Abram, Spero C Nicholas, Clay B Holroyd, Elhum A Shamshiri, Martin Paulus, Judith M Ford, Daniel H Mathalon, Susanna L Fryer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ken J LauMental Health Services, Veterans Affairs San Francisco Healthcare System, San Francisco, California, USA.
Brian J RoachNorthern California Institute for Research and Education, San Francisco, California, USA.
Samantha AbramMental Health Services, Veterans Affairs San Francisco Healthcare System, San Francisco, California, USA.
Spero C NicholasNorthern California Institute for Research and Education, San Francisco, California, USA.
Clay B HolroydDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Elhum A ShamshiriMental Illness Research Education and Clinical Centers, Veterans Administration Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA.
Martin PaulusLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.
Judith M FordMental Health Services, Veterans Affairs San Francisco Healthcare System, San Francisco, California, USA.
Daniel H MathalonMental Health Services, Veterans Affairs San Francisco Healthcare System, San Francisco, California, USA.
Susanna L FryerMental Health Services, Veterans Affairs San Francisco Healthcare System, San Francisco, California, USA.

Funding

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs CX001028U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs CX001980
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multimodal imaging studies that combine temporally and spatially precise methods can enhance understanding of reward neurocircuitry by revealing how signals specifically time-locked to reward processing substages relate to functional network-level activity. Prior reward studies that require decision making and/or motor responses to obtain rewards may complicate efforts to isolate basic reward responses from higher-order functions that support reward attainment. Here, we take an integrated, multimodal approach to evaluate anticipatory and consummatory reward processing substages, while minimizing demands on higher-order cognitive and motor processes. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electrophysiological (EEG) data were separately recorded from 52 adults playing a simple, slot machine task, with reward outcomes independent of performance. Joint Independent Component Analyses (jICAs) were conducted with EEG-based event-related potential (ERP) difference waveforms and fMRI contrast images specific to reward anticipation and outcome processing substages. Resulting joint independent components (JICs) segregated reward processing substages, indicating significant co-modulation between temporal ERP and spatial fMRI signals (p < 0.001). During Reward Anticipation, a JIC with the temporal signature of the stimulus preceding negativity (SPN) ERP component covaried with fMRI activation in bilateral supplementary motor areas (pre-SMA/SMA) and inferior fronto-insular salience network regions implicated in attentional orienting and shifting. During Reward Feedback, JICs with the temporal signature of the reward positivity (RewP) ERP component covaried with fMRI activation in dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), ventral striatum, SMA, and inferior frontal cortex, extending to the insula. Further, trait reward sensitivity correlated with jICA-informed Win > Loss brain activations during Reward Feedback (p = 0.016). Our findings demonstrate that temporally precise electrophysiological and spatially rich hemodynamic measures of reward processing converge to map onto specific substages of reward-related brain processes. ERP and fMRI signaling during reward feedback support covariation of the RewP with dACC-striatal reward networks while the SPN covaried with fMRI signal in pre-SMA/SMA and inferior fronto-insular regions implicated in motor planning, salience, and attention.

Indexed as

Anticipation, PsychologicalBrainBrain MappingElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultimodal ImagingRewardAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultfrontal‐medial negativitymotivation and pleasurepositive valence systemreward anticipationreward feedback and consumption

Identifiers

PMID41681123
PMCPMC12901666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.