ArticleHealthcare informatics research2026
Developing a Training Program for Healthcare Data Professionals in South Korea: A Needs Analysis.
Article in Healthcare informatics research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe purpose of this study was to investigate practitioners' demands regarding curriculum programs and to suggest directions for future program development aimed at training healthcare data professionals.
methodsAn online survey was conducted among 67 healthcare data practitioners who voluntarily participated in a training program designed to foster specialized professionals in healthcare data utilization on October 25, 2024. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS version 27.0.
resultsThe most common data-related issue encountered by practitioners was concern regarding security and privacy protection, which was reported by 49.3% of participants. With respect to areas requiring improvement in job roles, 34.3% of respondents identified healthcare data analysis and utilization as the most critical domain. Practitioners emphasized the importance of governance-related competencies, and there was a strong demand for education in research ethics and data review processes. In addition, statistically significant differences were observed among groups with respect to the levels of education required.
conclusionsTraining programs designed to encourage professionals to utilize healthcare data should be structured as practice-oriented, hands-on programs that integrate both theoretical instruction and practical training. Furthermore, advanced education related to institutional review boards and data review boards should be incorporated as a core component of the curriculum. Finally, it is necessary to develop a comprehensive and detailed interdisciplinary educational program grounded in the five core competencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.