ArticleHealthcare informatics research2026
Development and Validation of a Predictive AI Framework for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Monitoring and Severity Assessment: A Step towards Self-monitoring and Primary Care Integration.
Article in Healthcare informatics research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-Based Models for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment: Scoping Review.JMIR diabetes · 2026Review
- A severity-aware multi-task CNN-transformer framework for explainable diabetic foot ulcer triage and mobile deployment.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesDiabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a critical complication of diabetes that can lead to severe outcomes such as infection, amputation, and increased mortality if left untreated. Early detection and continuous monitoring are essential but remain challenging, especially in resource-limited settings such as India. This study developed and validated a deep learning algorithm to classify diabetic foot images into severity grades based on the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot classification: grade 0 (healthy), grade 1 (mild), grade 2 (moderate), and grade 3 (severe).
methodsA dataset of 407 clinical images was collected from open-source platforms and clinics in South India and expanded to 612 images through data augmentation. The dataset was divided into training (70%), validation (15%), and testing (15%) subsets. Multiple machine learning models were tested, including MobileNet_V2, EfficientNet-b0, DenseNet121, ResNet_50, VGG16, and ViT_b_16.
resultsAmong the evaluated models, MobileNet_V2 demonstrated the highest validation accuracy (82%) and achieved an F1-score of 79% on the test set. Although the model showed strong training accuracy, minor overfitting was observed, particularly in distinguishing adjacent severity grades. To address this, dropout, batch normalization, and early stopping were employed. Overall, the model generalized well, showing high accuracy in detecting healthy cases and acceptable performance across ulcer severity grades.
conclusionsThis study underscores the potential of machine learning-based tools to support frontline healthcare workers and facilitate patient self-monitoring in low-resource environments. Future work will focus on refining the model and integrating it into user-friendly applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.