Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41680997›Full record

ArticleHealthcare informatics research2026

Machine Learning for Predicting Coronary Heart Disease Risk in Patients with Hypertension: An Ensemble Modeling Approach.

Fadratul Hafinaz Hassan, Shuchen Wang, Alina Miron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare informatics research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fadratul Hafinaz HassanSchool of Computer Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.
Shuchen WangUniversity-Town Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Alina MironDepartment of Computer Science, Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to develop an optimized ensemble learning model to improve the prediction of hypertension complicated by coronary heart disease (CHD) through advanced feature selection and classifier fusion, thereby enhancing both accuracy and stability in risk assessment.

methodsWe constructed an ensemble-based predictive model using voting fusion to enhance early detection of hypertension complicated by CHD. The dataset comprised 2,487 patients with essential hypertension (EH) complicated by CHD and 3,904 non-CHD controls. Following data preprocessing procedures, including data cleaning and univariate and multivariate feature selection, an 18-dimensional feature set was derived. Five machine learning algorithms (logistic regression, random forest, XGBoost, CatBoost, and CART) were trained independently and subsequently integrated through a voting ensemble to optimize predictive performance.

resultsThe voting fusion model outperformed all individual classifiers, achieving an area under the curve of 0.906 and an accuracy of 0.888 in predicting EH complicated by CHD.

conclusionsThe proposed ensemble model improves classification accuracy and robustness, offering a clinically useful tool for early risk stratification of hypertension-associated CHD. Although the model demonstrates strong predictive performance using cross-sectional data, its reliance on single-timepoint measurements and selected control populations necessitates further validation. Pending additional studies, this framework may serve as a supplementary decision-support tool within clinical informatics systems.

Indexed as

Coronary DiseaseEnsemble LearningHypertensionMachine LearningPrediction Algorithms

Identifiers

PMID41680997
PMCPMC12902124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.