ArticleJournal of activity, sedentary and sleep behaviors2026
MOVE@NUS digital intervention cohort: protocol of a pilot study to promote healthy movement in university students.
Article in Journal of activity, sedentary and sleep behaviors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06597890 (Move@NUS), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Move@NUS: Pilot Study of a Digital Intervention Cohort to Promote Healthy Sleep, Screen Viewing, and Physical Activity Habits for Improved Health and Wellbeing
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDue to academic pressures and irregular schedules, university students often face challenges in maintaining healthy movement behaviours (including sleep, physical activity, and screen time), which are interrelated and influence both physical and mental health. Smartwatch- and smartphone-based ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) and ecological momentary interventions (EMIs) offer real-time, context-aware strategies to promote movement behaviours. This pilot study aims to assess the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of a hybrid approach that combines continuous digital monitoring of movement behaviours with sequentially embedded randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating EMIs. METHODS/
designMOVE@NUS pilot study employed a five-month hybrid design that combines continuous passive monitoring (primarily via Apple Watches, supplemented by iPhones) with three embedded RCTs targeting sleep (RCT-1), physical activity (RCT-2), and screen time (RCT-3). For each RCT, participants are randomised on a 1:1:1 schedule (control, intervention 1, intervention 2). Eligible participants are first-year undergraduates at the National University of Singapore, aged 18-25 years, who own or regularly use an iPhone and an Apple Watch. EMIs, delivered via the study app, comprise standard health messages or personalised reminders based on HealthKit data or participants' self-reported behaviours and preferences. Self-reported measures include eight EMA bursts (three-day periods every two weeks) and online questionnaires at baseline, midway (2.5 months), and endpoint (5 months). All EMIs and EMAs are text-based and can be completed in under two minutes. Feasibility outcomes include recruitment, engagement, and user experience assessed through quantitative surveys and semi-structured interviews. Preliminary effectiveness will be explored separately for each RCT, comparing movement behaviours between intervention and control groups. DISCUSSION: Findings from this study will inform the development of scalable and longer-term digital intervention cohorts for promoting healthier lifestyles among university students. Furthermore, as university students soon transition to the workforce, insights gained will inform scalable digital health interventions for broader populations.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT06597890 First Posted: 19 September 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.