ArticleJournal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care2026
Non-invasive ICP monitoring when invasive systems are available in the care of acute brain injured patients: a clinical approach.
Article in Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Correction: Non-invasive ICP monitoring when invasive systems are available in the care of acute brain injured patients: a clinical approach.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Invasive intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is considered the gold standard for the management of patients with an acute brain injury and at risk of developing intracranial hypertension (IH). However, invasive devices (e.g., intraparenchymal probe or external ventricular drain) are expensive, not available worldwide, and might be associated with some risks. Recently, a consensus for the monitoring and management of traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients when invasive ICP is not available (B-ICONIC) was developed. This approach is based on repeated neurological evaluation, neuroimaging, and the use of non-invasive ICP monitoring tools, such as transcranial Doppler, automated pupillometry, and ultrasound optic nerve sheath diameter measurement, to titrate interventions aiming at controlling ICP. Despite this clinical algorithm was mainly proposed for low and middle-income countries where invasive ICP is not widely implemented, a potential application of this approach may exist even in healthcare facilities where direct ICP monitoring is available. This includes patients who may have contraindications to invasive monitoring, such as coagulopathy, as well as those in whom ICP monitoring is not routinely implemented, such as individuals with post-anoxic brain injury or acute liver failure, for the reported occurrence of cerebral edema and potential risk of IH in these cases. Therefore, the aim of this manuscript is to propose the extension of the B-ICONIC algorithm to a wider population, regardless of the decision to insert an ICP sensor, and to guide their management using this multimodal approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.