Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41680884›Full record

ReviewCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2026

Imaging the efficacy and side effects of CAR T-cell therapy in children and young adults.

Iryna Vasyliv, Zahra Shokri Varniab, Shashi B Singh, Claire Johns, Sneha Ramakrishna, Kara L Davis, Heike E Daldrup-Link

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Iryna VasylivDivision of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Zahra Shokri VarniabDivision of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Shashi B SinghDivision of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Claire JohnsDepartment of Pediatrics, Bass Center for Childhood Cancer and Blood Disorders, Center for Cancer Cell Therapy, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Sneha RamakrishnaDepartment of Pediatrics, Bass Center for Childhood Cancer and Blood Disorders, Center for Cancer Cell Therapy, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Kara L DavisDepartment of Pediatrics, Bass Center for Childhood Cancer and Blood Disorders, Center for Cancer Cell Therapy, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Heike E Daldrup-LinkDivision of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. heiked@stanford.edu.

Funding

Advanced Imaging Tools to Assess Cancer Therapeutics in Pediatric PatientsR01CA269231 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Heike Elizabeth Daldrup-Link · 2022 to 2026
$3.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA269231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CAR T-cell therapy is a transformative immunotherapy for pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory malignancies. Imaging plays a crucial role in evaluating treatment efficacy and detecting complications. This review provides time-specific guidance for radiologists on the imaging findings before and after CAR T-cell infusion and highlights how imaging supports clinical decision-making across the treatment course. Pre-treatment imaging at baseline focuses on ruling out active infection and quantifying residual tumor burden. In addition, quantitative imaging biomarkers can predict tumor response and toxicity risk. Between day 0–28 after CAR T-cell infusion, imaging is primarily performed to detect side effects, such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). At day + 28, imaging provides early assessment of tumor response. Radiologists must recognize atypical immune-related response patterns at this time, including pseudoprogression and, less commonly, hyperprogression. Beyond day 28, imaging monitors for late side effects and infections, while also documenting ongoing tumor response or recurrence. Familiarity with these time-specific imaging patterns and pitfalls, coupled with knowledge of quantitative biomarkers, enables radiologists to differentiate toxicity from therapeutic effect, avoid misclassification of early immune-related changes, and optimize outcomes in pediatric CAR T-cell therapy.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveNeoplasmsAdolescentChildHumansCAR T-cell therapyCytokine release syndromeICANSImaging biomarkersImmunotherapyPediatric oncologyTreatment response

Identifiers

PMID41680884
PMCPMC12998385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.