Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41680863›Full record

ArticlePorcine health management2026

Dietary supplementation with microencapsulated organic acids and essential oils improves sow productivity and nursery pig performance under commercial field conditions.

Aprilia Rizky Riadini, Pornchalit Assavacheep, Kris Angkanaporn, Sukuma Samngamnim, Akaradet Seemacharoensri, Glenmer Bathan Tactacan, Ludovic Lahaye, Anongnart Assavacheep

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Porcine health management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aprilia Rizky RiadiniDepartment of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-6991-0869
Pornchalit AssavacheepDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2236-0336
Kris AngkanapornDepartment of Veterinary Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9195-136X
Sukuma SamngamnimDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Akaradet SeemacharoensriJefo Nutrition Inc., Saint-Hyacinthe, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3835-8975
Glenmer Bathan TactacanJefo Nutrition Inc., Saint-Hyacinthe, Canada.
Ludovic LahayeJefo Nutrition Inc., Saint-Hyacinthe, Canada.
Anongnart AssavacheepDepartment of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand. Anongnart.S@chula.ac.th.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6305-6736

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOrganic acids (OA) and essential oils (EO) are used in swine diets to reduce diarrhea and support gut health. Although their benefits on growth and fecal microflora have been reported, data under commercial conditions especially involving both sows and nursery pigs remain limited. In this study, two experiments were conducted to investigate the effect of microencapsulated organic acids and essential oils P(OA + EO) on sow productivity and nursery pig performance. The first experiment, 334 sows were divided into 2 groups: (1) Control group, (2) Treatment group fed diet supplemented with P(OA + EO) from 7 days before to 28 days after farrowing. The second experiment, 3065 nursery piglets were divided into 2 groups: (1) Control group allocated into phase I (28–49 days of age) and phase II (50–70 days of age), (2) Treatment group fed the same phase I diet supplemented with 2 kg/ton P(OA + EO), and phase II with 1 kg/ton P(OA + EO).

resultsSows fed P(OA + EO) had significantly lower BCS and body fat losses compared with Control group. Percentage of sows with shoulder ulcer was lower in P(OA + EO) group. ADFI of sows in P(OA + EO) group was statistically higher than Control group. Number of pigs with diarrhea/litter, pre-weaning mortality, average weaned pigs/litter, average weaning weight/litter and average daily litter weight gain were all significantly improved by P(OA + EO). In the nursery pig experiment, ADFI and ADG were significantly higher, while FCR was significantly improved in P(OA + EO) group. At 28 days of age, total fecal bacterial population in P(OA + EO) group was significantly lower than Control group, whereas total fecal bacterial population, coliform, E. coli and Lactobacillus spp. were higher at 70 days. However, Lactobacillus spp./Total bacteria ratio (L/T) and Lactobacillus spp./Coliform ratio (L/C) were similar between treatment groups at 28, 49, and 70 days.

conclusionSupplementation of P(OA + EO) during lactation yielded significant improvements in sow productivity and suckling performance of piglets. Extending supplementation of P(OA + EO) into nursery period revealed positive impacts on growth performance of weaned piglets. These improvements could be attributed to the positive effect of P(OA + EO) on feed intake, leading to increased nutrient assimilation.

Indexed as

Essential oilFecal bacteria populationGrowth performanceNursery pigOrganic acidSows

Identifiers

PMID41680863
PMCPMC12997692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.