Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41680857›Full record

ArticleZoological letters2026

Nest architecture and male aggression drive sexual isolation between three-spined stickleback ecotypes.

Carl Smith, Rowena Spence, Eliza Szczerkowska-Majchrzak, Dawid Żegota, Grzegorz Zięba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zoological letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carl SmithDepartment of Ecology and Vertebrate Zoology, University of Łódź, Banacha 12/16, Łódź, 90-237, Poland. carl.smith@biol.uni.lodz.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3285-0379
Rowena SpenceInstitute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Květná 8, Brno, 603 00, Czech Republic.
Eliza Szczerkowska-MajchrzakDepartment of Ecology and Vertebrate Zoology, University of Łódź, Banacha 12/16, Łódź, 90-237, Poland.
Dawid ŻegotaDepartment of Ecology and Vertebrate Zoology, University of Łódź, Banacha 12/16, Łódź, 90-237, Poland.
Grzegorz ZiębaDepartment of Ecology and Vertebrate Zoology, University of Łódź, Banacha 12/16, Łódź, 90-237, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To understand how sexual isolation contributes to the evolution of reproductive barriers, we examined the pre- and post-zygotic reproductive barriers between ecotypes of the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) from North Uist, where the species has undergone an adaptive radiation. Using an experimental design that separated the effects of ecotype, population of origin, and body size, we identified a pre-zygotic barrier attributed solely to ecotype; pairings within ecotypes were more likely to result in mating than those between ecotypes, regardless of population origin or relative body size of males and females. This effect was associated with reproductive incompatibilities linked to the failure of armoured females to enter the unusually small nests of armourless males, along with high levels of aggression from armoured males directed at armourless females. In vitro crosses did not reveal post-zygotic reproductive barriers associated with ecotype or population of origin. These findings indicate that sexual isolation, linked primarily to male traits and involving the coupling of barrier effects, is a significant obstacle to gene flow among the ecotypes, supporting an emerging view that pre-zygotic sexual isolation tends to evolve rapidly and at an early stage during ecological divergence.

Indexed as

Assortative matingCourtshipFertilisationMate choiceReproductionSexual selection

Identifiers

PMID41680857
PMCPMC13055007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.