ReviewBiomedical engineering online2026
Respiratory mechanics: modelling, measurement and clinical applications-a review.
Review in Biomedical engineering online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The mechanical properties of the airways significantly impact respiration, and estimating respiratory mechanics provides important insights for diagnosing and monitoring respiratory diseases, such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Here, we review electrical equivalent models of human respiratory mechanics and derive the mathematical expressions of their impedance. We describe the necessity of transitioning from a basic single-compartment model to a multi-frequency constant-phase model to represent respiratory mechanics in both health and disease. We review the forced oscillation technique and impulse oscillometry systems, which are clinically used to measure respiratory mechanics via respiratory impedance, and examine their roles in respiratory diseases. We also describe how respiratory impedance can be interpreted using these electrical analog representations to estimate key mechanical parameters. Attention is given to the limitations arising from device-specific variability and intra- and inter-breath fluctuations, where frequency-compensation filters and modelling strategies incorporating nonlinear resistance and compliance models could enhance the robustness and standardization of impedance-based analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.