Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41680815›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical semantics2026

A practical and nuanced framework for entity linking evaluation.

Fuqi Xu, Goran Nenadic, Robert Stevens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical semantics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fuqi XuDepartment of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Kilburn Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Goran NenadicDepartment of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Kilburn Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Robert StevensDepartment of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Kilburn Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. robert.stevens@manchester.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEntity linking maps textual mentions with entities in vocabularies. While accuracy is the primary metric for entity linking evaluation, it fails to capture the complexity of model behaviour.

resultsWe propose an entity linking evaluation framework that clarifies the target objects of metrics calculation, incorporates term hierarchy, generates performance profiles, and summarises them as model characteristics. The framework emphasises hierarchical vocabulary structures, shifting the focus from text-level label matching to semantic comparison between concepts. We illustrate the competence and utility of this framework through a case study on disease entity linking.

conclusionOur results highlight the importance of aligning evaluation metrics with application-specific requirements, and provide structured hierarchical error analysis for entity linking, paving the way for more nuanced and practical assessments of entity linking systems.

Indexed as

SemanticsBenchmarkingEntity linkingEvaluationHierarchical vocabulary

Identifiers

PMID41680815
PMCPMC12967008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.