ReviewJournal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England)2026
Scoping review on the effect of labour inspections on occupational health and safety: a meta-analytic update.
Review in Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this scoping review was to summarise recent literature on labour inspections carried out by government authorities and accident insurance organisations, and their impact on workers’ health and safety.
methodsA scoping review was conducted to investigate the effect of occupational safety and health (OSH) inspectorate interventions on occupational safety and health. The methodical approach was based on a previous systematic review on the effect of inspections on OSH. Literature searches were performed in PubMed, Web of Science and NIOSHTIC-2, complemented by screening of reference lists of the included full texts and topic-relevant reviews and a forward search in Google Scholar. Additionally, OSH authorities and accident insurance institutions in Germany, as well as the EU-OSHA national focal points were asked to submit reports on OSH inspections. Furthermore, the ‘grey’ literature search was extended to publications from the federal governments in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Findings were extracted and combined with studies from the above-mentioned systematic review for meta-analysis. The study protocol with the methodological procedure was registered on Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/gy2u6/ ).
resultsA total of 37 publications from Europe and North America on the effect of OSH inspections by government authorities were included in the study. Most of the studies examined the effect of labour inspections on (fatal and non-fatal) injuries at work, as well as the implementation of safety measures and compliance with legal requirements. The results of the individual studies generally indicate a protective effect of labour inspections on work-related injuries and compliance, but the results regarding compensation claims were heterogenous. In addition, pooled risk estimates from meta-analyses indicate that inspected workplaces had a lower risk of work-related injuries (relative risk (RR) = 0.75, 95% CI 0.57–0.97) and of non-compliance with workplace safety rules (RR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.45–1.01) compared with non-inspected workplaces.
conclusionsOur results reinforce the findings of previous reviews that inspections are effective in reducing work-related injuries. Thus, inspections are important for promoting and improving occupational health and safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.