ArticleBMC health services research2026
Early impacts of PEPFAR funding freeze on HIV service delivery in mid-Western Uganda.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cost-effectiveness of differentiated HIV service delivery in North Wollo, Ethiopia: a retrospective study.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Documenting HIV service delivery and adoption of evidence-based practices in HIV care programs: A protocol for a cross-sectional survey of HIV clinics participating in the International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA).medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- U.S. Funding Cuts and Health System Challenges in Community-Based HIV Programmes in Rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- A snapshot of how U.S. funding cuts impacted HIV care in one county of Kenya: a qualitative case study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAlthough there is an emerging evidence base on the impact of planned donor transitions from HIV programs, there is little research exploring the effects of abrupt cessation of donor aid for HIV programs. We sought to examine the early impacts of PEPFAR funding freeze announced on 20th January 2025 on HIV service delivery in Mid-western Uganda.
methodsWe conducted a qualitative study in the Fort Portal region of mid-Western Uganda, involving 84 participants. In-depth interviews were conducted with 36 health workers in eight purposively selected HIV clinics. Six focus group discussions with a total of 48 participants were conducted with people with HIV (PWH). Data were analyzed by thematic approach.
resultsFour broad themes emerged in our analysis (1) There was uncertainty and confusion across the HIV service delivery landscape right from national-level HIV sector oversight to frontline service delivery. (2) PWH started ‘buffer stocking’ of antiretrovirals which contributed to stock-outs at participating facilities. (3) There was discontinuation of multiple HIV services. The discontinued HIV services include HIV prevention programs, viral load testing, services targeting ‘Key Populations’ and, community outreach for enhancing adherence to HIV/TB treatment including medication distribution through private retail pharmacies which ceased. (4) The loss of PEPFAR-salaried HIV workforce had ripple effects. These include disruptions in routine operations at HIV clinics, sub-national governance mechanisms for HIV services delivery unraveled and loss of PEPFAR-supported community health workers resulted in cessation of community outreach activities while loss of data clerks impeded routine HIV data capture.
conclusionThe abrupt cessation of PEPFAR funding resulted in widespread disruptions to HIV service delivery including discontinuation of multiple HIV services at participating facilities. Our findings highlight the need for planned donor transitions and the need of strengthening the financial, technical, and management capacity of recipient governments for managing previously donor-funded HIV services. Further research on the medium- to long-term impacts of PEPFAR funding freeze is warranted. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.