ArticleBMC women's health2026
Quiet residents of the vaginal epithelium: immunohistochemical study on the distribution and role of human vaginal Merkel cells.
Article in BMC women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough Merkel cells (MCs) are well-established mechanoreceptors in human skin, their function within the vaginal epithelium remains undefined. The aim of the present histological study was to investigate whether MCs located in the stratified epithelium of the anterior wall of the human vagina exhibit similar mechanosensory functions to those observed in the skin.
methodsImmunohistochemical analysis was performed on vaginal wall samples from eight women undergoing transabdominal or laparoscopic surgery. Immunohistochemical markers including cytokeratin 20 (CK20), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), synaptophysin (SYN), chromogranin A (CHRA), vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), PIEZO2 and protein gene product 9.5 (PGP9.5) were used to identify MCs and assess their distribution and phenotype. To better demonstrate the connection of MCs with nerve fibres, we used sequential double immune-enzymatic technique with different markers for MCs and for nerve fibres (primary antibodies against CK20 and PGP 9.5) and confirmed that none of examined MCs was in contact with the nerve fibre.
resultsMCs were identified as CK20-positive in all specimens (100%), NSE-positive in 88%, SYN-positive in 25%, CHRA-positive in 100%, and VIP-positive in 25%. No samples demonstrated positivity for CGRP and PIEZO2. MCs were localized predominantly in the basal epithelial layers as solitary cells, with CK20 the most effective detection method. Sequential double immune-enzymatic technique confirmed non- innervated Merkel cells with dendritic morphology.
conclusionsThis is the first study to address the possible function of MCs in the vaginal epithelium. The absence of PIEZO2 and CGRP expression, and low expression of VIP and SYN, suggests a non-mechanosensory and non-nociceptive role for MCs in the vaginal epithelium. The immunophenotypic profile supports a potential endocrine (paracrine or autocrine) function distinct from their role in human skin. Vaginal MCs probably form part of the neuroendocrine system of the vagina and maintain vaginal epithelial homeostasis and regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.