ArticleBMC public health2026
Understanding the role, barriers, and motivators of takeaway food purchasing and consumption in English families across socioeconomic positions: a secondary qualitative analysis.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRates of obesity are rising globally, with socioeconomic inequalities driving this disproportionately in lower income communities. The COVID-19 pandemic and ongoing cost-of-living crisis have further exacerbated unhealthy eating patterns, including a rise in the ‘out of home’ sector. Understanding these food dynamics in families is crucial for informing equitable obesity prevention policies, particularly given than takeaway foods are often calorie dense, lacking key nutrients, and have been linked to obesity This study explores the role, barriers, and motivators of takeaway food purchasing and consumption for families in England, and whether this differed by socioeconomic position (SEP).
methodsInductive thematic analysis was conducted with a constructivist ontology lens. Participants were 20 higher and lower SEP parents/carers of school or nursery aged children across Bradford, Brent, and Folkestone and Hythe.
resultsBoth higher and lower SEP participants saw takeaways as a treat, a break from cooking, and a tradition. Lower SEP participants described these takeaway traditions as having begun when COVID-19 restrictions were introduced and expressed intentions to continue them. Higher SEP families used takeaways to try new cuisines and as a social event with the family. Price was a barrier for both higher and lower SEP participants, but only lower SEP families saw promotional offers as a motivator. Negative service experiences were a barrier for higher SEP participants. Both higher and lower SEP participants shared other family members buying takeaways as a motivator.
conclusionsThis research suggests takeaways play a role in many families’ lives by producing structure, facilitating social events, and providing emotional support. These results contribute context and understanding of families’ food environments. As lower SEP families described being motivated by promotional offers, policy options to restrict the promotion of less healthy options should be explored.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.