ArticleBMC public health2026
Current status of public education on endocrine and metabolic diseases carried out by academic journals' WeChat official accounts: a retrospective study.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo investigate the current status of public education on endocrine and metabolic diseases through WeChat official accounts (WOAs) of academic medical journals in China and to identify the factors that influence user engagement.
methodsA retrospective study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of WOAs from both general medical journals (GMJs) and endocrinology medical journals (EMJs) listed in the Chinese Science Citation Database. After characterising the main features of the articles, we used generalized linear models to identify factors associated with the number of readings and likes of the articles. .
resultsThe study identified 16 WOAs of medical journals, consisting of 12 GMJs and 4 EMJs. From 2021 to 2023, these WOAs published a total of 1,033 articles on endocrine and metabolic diseases. The most popular topics were diabetes (680/1033, 65.8%), osteoporosis and metabolic bone disease (168/1033, 16.2%), and thyroid disease (62/1033, 6.0%). Multivariable regression analysis revealed that in GMJs, longer articles and those categorized as guideline/interpretation and expert consensus positively predicted both reading and liking counts. In EMJs, longer articles and guideline/interpretation and expert consensus categories were associated with increased reading counts, while guideline/interpretation and expert consensus articles also positively predicted liking counts.
conclusionAlthough articles on endocrine and metabolic diseases achieve relatively high engagement on WOAs of academic medical journals in China, the overall reads and like counts remain low. Further optimization of promotion strategies, especially for incorporating multimedia content, is needed to significantly enhance user engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.