ArticleBMC emergency medicine2026
Unpredictable emergency department cardiac arrest: clinical features and the limits of early warning scores and triage acuity.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEmergency department cardiac arrest (EDCA) is a distinct clinical entity for which early identification remains challenging. A clinically important subset may occur in patients initially classified as low acuity or low physiological risk, potentially delaying evaluation and treatment. We compared characteristics of predictable versus unpredictable EDCA and assessed whether low-acuity Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS) and low-risk National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) at triage are associated with unpredictable EDCA among EDCA cases. We also explored potential phenotypes within low-acuity/low-risk strata.
methodsA single-center retrospective study of adult patients (≥ 18 years) who experienced their first cardiac arrest after arrival in the ED was conducted between January 2018 and October 2023. Predictable EDCA was defined as cardiac arrest occurring in the resuscitation room or during transfer after deterioration had already been recognized, whereas unpredictable EDCA referred to events occurring in non-monitored areas. KTAS was dichotomized as high acuity (1–2) versus low acuity (3–5). NEWS2 was dichotomized as high risk (≥ 5 or any single parameter score of 3) versus low risk (< 5). Multivariable logistic regression identified KTAS/NEWS2 strata associated with unpredictable EDCA. Exploratory analyses summarized chief complaints and presumed etiologies by KTAS/NEWS2 strata.
resultsAmong 242 EDCA events, 98 (40.5%) were predictable and 144 (59.5%) were unpredictable. Unpredictable EDCA occurred later after ED arrival than predictable EDCA (median 242.5 vs. 41.5 min; p < 0.001). Rates of return of spontaneous circulation, 30-day mortality, and favorable neurological outcome at 30 days did not differ significantly. In multivariable analysis, low-acuity KTAS (adjusted OR 10.60; 95% CI 3.90–28.81) and low-risk NEWS2 (adjusted OR 2.06; 95% CI 1.06–4.01) were independently associated with unpredictable EDCA. Exploratory analyses suggested that chest pain presentations and hyperkalemia-related etiologies may represent potential missed-risk phenotypes within low-risk strata.
conclusionsAmong EDCA cases, unpredictable EDCA was associated with low-acuity KTAS and low-risk NEWS2 at triage. These findings suggest a potential process vulnerability during prolonged ED stays and generate hypotheses that dynamic reassessment and targeted diagnostics may be beneficial for selected presentations despite initially reassuring triage-time labels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.