ArticleBMC cancer2026
Nomogram-based prediction of checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis in lung cancer patients.
Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk factors for immune checkpoint inhibitor-related interstitial lung disease: a retrospective cohort study.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- From inflammatory phenotypes to clinical decisions: a stratified diagnostic and therapeutic framework for CIP.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCheckpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) is an uncommon but clinically severe adverse event that can seriously compromise the quality of life and can be potentially life-threatening in lung cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). However, there is still a lack of effective predictive models to predict the occurrence of CIP. The aim of this study was to develop a novel scoring system for predicting the risk of CIP based on a nomogram model.
methodsWe retrospectively screened patients with lung cancer who received ICI treatment at our hospital. The independent risk factors of CIP were identified by the univariable and multivariable analysis of the COX hazard regression model and were integrated to develop a nomogram predictive model. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the concordance index (C- index), and the calibration curve were used to evaluate the discrimination and prediction accuracy of the model. The clinical utility of the model was evaluated by decision curve analysis (DCA).
resultsA total of 2082 cancer patients were included in the analysis. In the final multivariate Cox regression analysis identified that sex, body mass index (BMI), chemotherapy, radiotherapy, C-reactive protein (CRP), CD4/CD8, white blood cell (WBC), ALB/GLB, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), neutrophil-to-platelet ratio (NPR), platelet-to-albumin ratio (PAR), and CRP-to-lymphocyte ratio (CLR) were the independent predictive factors for CIP. Based on these risk factors, a predictive nomogram model was constructed. The C-index for the nomogram model in predicting the probability of CIP at 1 year, 1.5 years, and 2 years was 0.704, 0.718, and 0.725, respectively. The average C-index (SD) was 0.712 (0.004), and the average AUC (SD) was 0.733 (0.005), calculated through 100 iterations of 10-fold cross-validation. The calibration curves demonstrated good concordance, and the DCA indicated that the model had good clinical utility.
conclusionsThe nomogram was accurate in predicting the occurrence of CIP in patients with lung cancer. This study provides a reference for screening CIP high-risk patients and for individualized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.