ArticleBMC emergency medicine2026
Routine laboratory data for predicting 30-day emergency department revisits: the AXIS-2 risk score.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThirty-day emergency department (ED) revisit is a major quality indicator reflecting morbidity and healthcare burden. Laboratory data obtained during outpatient encounters may capture underlying biological stress axes. This study aimed to develop and externally validate an interpretable logistic regression model—the AXIS-2 (Anemia–Inflammation Two-Axis Composite Index)—for predicting 30-day ED revisits using routine laboratory parameters.
methodsThis retrospective study included 92,386 adult outpatients who visited a tertiary academic hospital between January 2015 and August 2025. Laboratory variables were biologically grouped into two axes: Axis-1 (hematologic indicators of anemia and erythropoiesis: hemoglobin, lymphocyte count, mean corpuscular volume, neutrophil count, platelet count, red cell distribution width, and white blood cell count) and Axis-2 (inflammatory and catabolic markers: C-reactive protein, ferritin, albumin, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio). A multivariable logistic regression model was trained using stratified sampling and isotonic calibration. Model performance was assessed in both internal and external test datasets using discrimination (AUC-ROC, AUC-PR), classification (F1 score, MCC, sensitivity, specificity), calibration, and decision curve analysis.
resultsThe 30-day revisit rate was 30%. Both hematologic (Axis-1) and inflammatory (Axis-2) axes were independent predictors of revisit risk (Axis-1 OR 2.06; Axis-2 OR 2.31; p < 0.001). The model showed excellent discrimination (AUC-ROC 0.921 in the test set; 0.935 in the external set) and balanced classification accuracy (≈85% for both sensitivity and specificity). Negative predictive value reached 95%, and calibration metrics indicated strong concordance between predicted and observed probabilities. Decision curve analysis demonstrated clear net benefit within the 10–40% probability range. High-risk patients also exhibited higher 30-day readmission (≈45%), transfusion (≈15%), and 180-day mortality (≈3%) rates compared with the low-risk group.
conclusionsAXIS-2 is a transparent, laboratory-based model that accurately predicts 30-day emergency revisits and offers interpretable outputs suitable for integration into clinical workflows. Its strong calibration and decision-analytic benefit support its use as a cost-efficient tool for post-discharge monitoring and healthcare resource optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.