ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Cold tolerance in Cicer arietinum L. seedlings: multivariate insights into freezing stress resistance.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To enhance the cultivation of chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) in regions susceptible to low temperatures, it is imperative to comprehend the physiological and molecular mechanisms that enable plants to tolerate low-temperature stress. This study evaluated eight chickpea genotypes-KAKA and seven cold-resistant lines (MCC194, MCC605, MCC607, MCC613, MCC885, MCC901, and MCC911) from the Mashhad Chickpea Collection (MCC)-under a range of freezing temperatures (0, - 6, -10, - 12, and - 14 °C) using a comprehensive physiological, biochemical, and molecular approach. The plants were cultivated under semi-controlled conditions and underwent a cold acclimation process prior to undergoing freezing treatments. Cold-tolerant genotypes showed higher survival, biomass, and pigment levels under freezing stress, with less electrolyte leakage and more negative osmotic potential. They accumulated more proline, total soluble carbohydrate, phenolic, and antioxidants, especially at - 12 °C. The results of qRT-PCR showed upregulated expression of caCAT, caPOD, and caAPX as antioxidant genes, particularly in genotypes that were tolerant. Chlorophyll fluorescence confirmed better maximum quantum efficiency of photosystem II in these genotypes after cold exposure. Principal component analysis (PCA) and the correlation matrix revealed significant relationships among the measured indices. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) indicated that enzymatic activity was the strongest positive predictor of plant dry weight (β = 0.404), while membrane damage had a strong negative effect on it (β = -0.913). Furthermore, comprehensive membership function analysis ranked genotype MCC911 with the highest evaluation value (0.737) as the most tolerant and genotype KAKA with the lowest value (0.222) as the most sensitive. The findings indicate that maintaining membrane integrity, accumulating osmotically compatible compounds, and, particularly, activating the enzymatic antioxidant system are key mechanisms of freezing tolerance in chickpeas. Genotypes MCC911 and MCC901 are identified as promising candidates for use in breeding programs aimed at developing cold-tolerant cultivars for autumn planting. Collectively, these findings provide a detailed physiological and molecular framework for cold stress adaptation in chickpea and identify potential markers for breeding cold-resilient cultivars.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.