ArticleBMC ecology and evolution2026
Phylogenetic evidence reveals the classification and evolutionary history of endemic cavefish in China.
Article in BMC ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe phylogeny, classification, diversity, and distribution of cave species have always been difficult problems for taxonomists. In this study, we aim to clarify the phylogeny and evolutionary history of the cave-dwelling fish genus Sinocyclocheilus, a group that is not only difficult to collect but is also frequently under-recognized due to its cryptic nature, in order to elucidate its evolutionary patterns and dynamics.
resultsOur phylogeny supports the monophyly of the five current species groups (S. angularis, S. cyphotergous, S. jii, S. microphthalmus, and S. tingi groups), but a variety of evidence suggests that corresponding subgenera should be elevated. Our species delimitation analysis identified 84 species, including 18 cryptic. Molecular dating and biogeographic analyses revealed that Sinocyclocheilus originated in the late Eocene, ~ 40.32 millions of years ago (Ma), that the most recent common ancestor inhabited the Guijiang-Hejiang River and the Nanpanjiang River, ~ 34.61 Ma, and dispersed outward from the Nanpanjiang River Basin, and that an acceleration of speciation rates occurred during the late Eocene. A biogeographic dynamic meta-analysis showed that lineage divergence and in situ diversification began at ~ 38 Ma and increased sharply at ~ 24 Ma, with two peaks at ~ 15 and ~ 2.5 Ma and a valley at 2.5 Ma. Dispersal events began at ~ 28 Ma and increased sharply at ~ 12 Ma, with a distinct peak at ~ 5 Ma. The speciation rate increased rapidly between approximately 40 and 32 Ma, followed by a sustained, gradual decline.
conclusionsThe diversity of Sinocyclocheilus has been severely underestimated and requires a comprehensive reassessment integrating both morphological and genetic evidence. The revised classification comprises seven species groups or subgenera. The origin and diversification history of the genus were likely coupled with orogenic activities and the intensification of the Asian monsoon rainfall, which facilitated the formation of extensive subterranean voids, thereby creating ecological opportunities for speciation. Early high-temperature events may have initially triggered a rapid increase in speciation rates, whereas the relatively stable and cooler conditions of cave environments likely became less conducive to subsequent speciation. Our results also suggest a four-phase model of karst cave formation in southwestern China, with accelerating and decelerating periods in each phase. These evolutionary dynamics can be viewed as a response to shifts in paleogeoclimatic events since the Eocene.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.