ArticleBMC bioinformatics2026
hStouffer: the enhanced meta-analysis method for the comprehensive analysis of large-scale RNA-seq data.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWith the exponential growth of public RNA-seq datasets, meta-analysis has become a crucial tool for integrating studies to increase statistical power and identify consistent biological patterns. However, conventional p value combination methods were not designed for large-scale integration and exhibit a critical flaw: as more datasets are added, the rate of false positives increases dramatically. This issue stems from the disproportionate influence of extremely low p values from just a few individual studies, which can create a misleading signal of overall significance and undermine the reliability of the findings.
resultsHere, we introduce a robust meta-analysis framework that incorporates p value capping, cutoff thresholding, and bagging to alleviate this issue. We implemented this framework using Stouffer’s method, termed the hybrid Stouffer (hStouffer) method. The proposed method demonstrates a reduced false positive rate while preserving high sensitivity. Furthermore, the validation showed that the DEGs identified by hStouffer accurately reflect the underlying biological phenomena, making it an essential tool for leveraging the full potential of expanding genomic databases to understand complex biological processes.
conclusionsThe hStouffer method provides a statistically robust and biologically coherent solution for large-scale RNA-seq meta-analysis. By effectively controlling for technical artifacts and false discoveries, it enables researchers to extract more reliable and meaningful insights from complex, aggregated transcriptomic data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.