Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41680576›Full record

ArticleLearning & behavior2026

Online and in-person stress induction in a quasi-avoidance-based Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer task.

Ruoqi Tang, Jessica M Price, Charlotte Bonardi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning & behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ruoqi TangSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Jessica M PriceSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham Malaysia, Jalan Broga, 43500, Semenyih, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia.
Charlotte BonardiSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. Charlotte.Bonardi@nottingham.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pavlovian instrumental transfer (PIT) is a phenomenon in which a conditioned stimulus (CS), previously paired with a specific outcome, can influence performance of an instrumental response (R). PIT can be specific (the CS selectively elevates performance of an R paired with the same outcome as that CS) or general (CSs elevate performance of an R paired with any outcome of the same motivational value). PIT has been proposed as a mechanism underlying maintenance of addictive behaviours, while exposure to stressors is regarded as a risk factor for the development, maintenance and relapse of addiction. Thus, we used a quasi-avoidance-based PIT task to explore whether stress can influence the magnitude of specific or general PIT effects. We used stress induction procedures to elevate stress levels. These were either conducted online, exposing participants to negative pictures and heavy metal music (Experiment 1), or in person, telling participants they had to give a speech which would be filmed (Experiment 2). In neither experiment could we detect any effect of higher stress levels on specific or general PIT. The results do not support the proposal that stress influences the size of PIT effects in human participants.

Indexed as

Avoidance LearningConditioning, ClassicalConditioning, OperantStress, PsychologicalTransfer, PsychologyAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultAddictionGeneral PITPavlovian instrumental transferQuasi-avoidanceSpecific PITStress induction

Identifiers

PMID41680576
PMCPMC13538191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.