ArticleNeurosurgical review2026
Venous sinus outflow geometry as a predictor of transverse sinus stenting complexity.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The treatment of symptomatic transverse sinus (TS) stenosis by neurointerventional techniques is becoming more popular. Having the ability to predict procedural success and complexity holds a potential to increase success and reduce complication rates. Here we tried to assess procedural complexity by dural venous geometry parameters. We reviewed TS stenting or stent assisted coiling of all the patients treated for symptomatic TS stenosis during august 2021 and October 2023. The dataset was divided into two groups based on the shallowest angle (the angle of lowest energy, LEa) between the nadirs of the 3 turns – internal jugular vein, jugular foramen and proximal curve of the sigmoid sinus, and further comparison between these groups characteristics and procedural metrics was performed. Out of 20 procedures, six had a positive LEa and 14 a negative one. Negative LEa was associated with significantly longer interventional time (18.9 +/- 6.4 vs. 7.3 +/- 1.4 minutes; p = 0.004) and a higher jugular bulb (14.0 +/- 3.1 vs. 9.5 +/- 2.5 mm; p = 0.04). Regression analysis further showed that both LEa and TS stenosis independently predicted interventional time (-0.2 +/- 0.03 minutes per degree, p = 0.00003; and +29.1 +/- 8.8 minutes for a theoretical 100% stenosis, p = 0.005, respectively). Negative LEa is a novel strong geometric predictor of longer procedural time, with TS stenosis severity contributing additional delay. Incorporating these factors into planning may improve efficiency, outcomes, and safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41680565What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.