Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41680504›Full record

SynthesisEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Results of postoperative voice therapy for vocal cord polyps: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kun Yang, Qingzhu You, Shibin Huang, Jingfei Tao, Jiao Liang

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kun YangChongqing Three Gorges Medical College, College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 366 Tianxing Road, Bai'anba, Wanzhou District, Chongqing, China.
Qingzhu YouChongqing Three Gorges Medical College, College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 366 Tianxing Road, Bai'anba, Wanzhou District, Chongqing, China.
Shibin HuangPeople's Hospital Affiliated to Chongqing Three Gorges Medical College, No. 27 Guoben Road, Wanzhou District, Chongqing, China.
Jingfei TaoChongqing Three Gorges Medical College, College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 366 Tianxing Road, Bai'anba, Wanzhou District, Chongqing, China.
Jiao LiangChongqing Three Gorges Medical College, College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 366 Tianxing Road, Bai'anba, Wanzhou District, Chongqing, China. 20230028@cqtgmc.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0334-7870

Funding

Chongqing Three Gorges Medical College Traditional Chinese Medicine Prevention and Treatment Respiratory and Geriatric Disease Team 2023Wanzhou District Science and Technology Bureau Doctoral Express wzstc-20240026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe recovery of voice quality after vocal cord polyp surgery is a key concern for both patients and physicians. Voice therapy plays a significant role in the conservative treatment of vocal cord polyps. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of postoperative voice therapy on outcomes in patients with vocal cord polyps.

methodsAccording to PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic search for RCTs of postoperative voice therapy for vocal cord polyps published before January 24, 2025, in nine databases.

resultsNine RCTs involving 730 patients were included. Postoperative voice therapy significantly reduced VHI (MD = -9.66, 95%CI [-15.80, -3.53], P = 0.002). Additionally, it improved jitter (SMD = -1.16, 95% CI [-1.70, -0.63], P < 0.0001), shimmer (SMD = -1.18, 95% CI [-1.74, -0.63], P < 0.001), and DSI (SMD = 1.53, 95% CI [0.56, 2.49], P = 0.002), and prolonged MPT (SMD = 0.65, 95% CI [0.27, 1.03], P = 0.0008). However, considerable heterogeneity was observed across outcomes including VHI, jitter, shimmer, and DSI, and the overall sample size remains modest.

conclusionPostoperative voice therapy demonstrates efficacy in mitigating VHI, jitter, shimmer, and DSI scores, as well as extending MPT in patients with vocal cord polyps. However, these findings must be interpreted with caution due to the significant heterogeneity among the included studies, potential biases, and limited sample sizes. Future high-quality RCTs with larger sample sizes, standardized therapy protocols, and longer follow-up periods are needed to confirm these.

Indexed as

Laryngeal DiseasesPolypsPostoperative CareVocal CordsVoice TrainingHumansTreatment OutcomeVoice QualityMeta-analysisSystematic reviewVocal cord polypsVoice therapy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.