Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41680454›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Proteomic profiling of bronchoalveolar lavage following human segmental endotoxin challenge-a potential exacerbation model.

Christina Gress, Meike Müller, Jens M Hohlfeld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christina GressFraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine ITEM, Hannover, Germany.
Meike MüllerFraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine ITEM, Hannover, Germany.
Jens M HohlfeldFraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine ITEM, Hannover, Germany. jens.hohlfeld@item.fraunhofer.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Segmental lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge is a well-established method to induce airway inflammation in human lungs. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is typically used to capture molecular and cellular changes, allowing investigation of pulmonary inflammation and assessing drug efficacy. This study aimed to describe the proteomic profile of human BAL in the segmental LPS challenge model. Pre-challenge BAL was collected from ten healthy non-smoking participants, followed by segmental instillation of LPS (40 EU/kg) and saline in the contralateral lung as control. After 24 h, BAL was sampled from the challenged lung segments. Using the SomaScan platform, 1,500 proteins were analysed. As expected, no significant differences were found between pre-challenge and saline-challenged BAL. After LPS compared to saline challenge, 599 proteins such as IL-6, IL-8, MPO, MMP9, CRP, VWF, G-CSF and Eotaxin, were significantly upregulated and 4 proteins were downregulated in BAL. The most significant biological processes associated with upregulated proteins were “immune system process”, “response to external stimulus” and “response to chemical”. As expected, the LPS challenge triggered a strong pro-inflammatory response including proteome changes seen in acute exacerbations (AEs). Overall, this study provides a comprehensive analysis of the proteomic profile in BAL following LPS challenge and its similarities with AEs, contributing to a deeper understanding of this model.

Indexed as

Bronchoalveolar Lavage FluidLipopolysaccharidesProteomeProteomicsAdultBronchoalveolar LavageFemaleHumansLungMaleLipopolysaccharidesProteome

Identifiers

PMID41680454
PMCPMC12902028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.