Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41680449›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Exploring interactions of thermal, acoustic, and aesthetic environments on thermal experience in parks.

Yu Zhang, Yuta Uchiyama, Masayuki Sato

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yu ZhangGraduate School of Human Development and Environment, Kobe University, 3 11 Tsurukabuto, Nada-ku, 657 8501, Japan.
Yuta UchiyamaGraduate School of Human Development and Environment, Kobe University, 3 11 Tsurukabuto, Nada-ku, 657 8501, Japan.
Masayuki SatoGraduate School of Human Development and Environment, Kobe University, 3 11 Tsurukabuto, Nada-ku, 657 8501, Japan. msat@port.kobe-u.ac.jp.

Funding

Environment Research and Technology Development Fund by the Ministry of the Environment, Japan 1FS-2201Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 23K25067University-Driven Urban Innovation Kobe, Kobe city A25101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The thermal comfort of urban parks is crucial for residents' well-being and urban livability. There is limited research on the integration of different environmental factors in urban parks, with most studies focusing on hot, sunny days in summer. This study explored the interactions of multi-sensory factors, including thermal, acoustic, and aesthetic, on thermal experience in parks across various weather types. The results reveal that thermal conditions directly dominate thermal experience. Acoustic comfort has a relatively weak positive effect on thermal comfort, and this effect disappears under strong heat-stress conditions. Natural sounds help increase thermal acceptability, whereas mechanically dominated soundscapes have the opposite effect. Aesthetic satisfaction also contributes to higher thermal acceptability. Compared with blue spaces, aesthetic satisfaction with green spaces exerts a more consistently positive influence on thermal experience. The negative effect of PET is significantly weaker than the positive effects of perceived acoustic comfort and aesthetic satisfaction on overall satisfaction. The revealed multi-sensory interactions yield practical recommendations for urban planners and designers in addressing climate change and enhancing urban livability.

Indexed as

EstheticsParks, RecreationalAcousticsHumansTemperatureThermal ComfortAcoustic environmentGreen-blue spacesLandscape aesthetic qualityMicroclimateOutdoor thermal comfort

Identifiers

PMID41680449
PMCPMC12976342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.