ArticleScientific reports2026
Machine learning in predicting failures of buried water supply networks affected by mining impacts.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The article presents the research results concerning the failure predicting of buried water supply pipelines located in mining areas. Such underground infrastructure components are common in mining areas and generate many difficult problems related to their proper use. Network failures are difficult to predict and prevent, resulting in decreased comfort for residents and increased water consumption, to the detriment of the natural environment. From this perspective, it is a broader issue related to sustainable development. To address this problem, machine learning methods have been proposed as effective tools for modeling multifactorial and complex phenomena with implicit behavior. The study implemented five different approaches to describe the phenomenon under investigation. Each of them was based on the use of ML methods previously selected for this purpose. The results indicate that the most effective methods for modeling the failure process of underground water supply networks are eXtreme Gradient Boosting (RMSE 0.43 for training set and 2.03 for test set) and Support Vector Machine (RMSE 0.66 and 0.71). During the research, factors determining the process of underground water pipeline failures were identified and graded according to their relevance. It turned out that among the input factors, the most important is the length of the analyzed section of the network, followed by its technical age. Horizontal strain and diameter proved to be less important than the two main factors mentioned above. It has been demonstrated that the ML methods used can be very helpful in monitoring and managing the failures of underground water pipelines affected by mining impacts. The conducted research may serve as an inspiration for further research on the failure rate of various infrastructure networks in mining areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.