ArticleScientific reports2026
Machine learning techniques based multi-parameter analysis and design of nonlinear helical structures considering internal structure collisions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Helical structures are widely used in various engineering disciplines due to their energy storage and vibration damping characteristics. Existing studies have investigated the dynamic responses of various helical structures under static, low-speed dynamic and high-speed dynamic loadings. However, systematic understandings on the relationship between the complicated multi-parameters of helical structures and significant spike forces remain challenging. The present work develops a transient finite element model for a beehive helical structure sample, of which results are validated by a real engine test at 7800 rpm engine speed. The simulation results are in excellent agreement with the testing results and reveal that the dynamic spike forces are caused by collision effects between narrow coils. Next, 2 types of machine learning models, namely a deep neural networks (DNN) model and a genetic programming (GP) model, are developed and compared using simulation results. It is noted that the deep neural networks model has better prediction accuracy with the R² value of the testing set reaches 0.939. Finally, the relationships between multiple geometric parameters of the helical structure and the peak dynamic forces are plotted based on the developed machine learning model. In addition, design spaces that balance lower peak forces and vibration damping performance are proposed. These findings would be beneficial for systematic multi-parameter analysis and better designs of helical structures with superior mechanical performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.