ArticleScientific reports2026
Anatomical and functional asymmetry predicts G-force tolerance in high-Intensity physical performers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anatomical asymmetry is known to affect motor control and postural stability, but its impact under extreme physical stress, such as gravitational acceleration, remains underexplored. This study examined the association between anatomical asymmetry, functional movement patterns, occlusal force distribution, and G-force tolerance in Air Force cadets. Thirty male cadets underwent a G-force tolerance test using a human centrifuge. Functional asymmetry was assessed using the Functional Movement Screen (FMS), and occlusal force distribution was measured with a pressure-sensitive film system. Skeletal muscle mass was evaluated using bioelectrical impedance analysis. Participants were categorized into pass and fail groups based on G-test results. Group comparisons and multiple regression analyses were conducted to identify predictors of G-force performance. Skeletal muscle mass was significantly higher in the pass group, while other body composition variables showed no differences. The pass group outperformed the fail group in most FMS items, with the fail group showing greater bilateral imbalances in both FMS and occlusal force. Regression analysis identified significant associations between G-test outcomes and occlusal force parameters, and correlation analysis confirmed strong relationships with skeletal muscle mass and FMS scores, particularly the hurdle step. Functional and structural symmetries, especially movement patterns and occlusal balances, were associated with G-test outcomes, which serve as indirect indicators of tolerance to gravitational acceleration. Targeted interventions such as strength training and neuromuscular coordination exercises may be considered as potential strategies for future research to improve G-force tolerance and reduce injury risk in high-intensity physical activity populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.